This heartfelt note struck a chord with many who have followed Sana’s journey — from a popular TV face to her spiritual transformation and now, a grieving daughter.
There is no doubt that many poor families struggle to afford proper wedding arrangements. But the concern lies not in what the scheme is offering, but in how that money could be used better. People are not rejecting support for poor daughters — they’re rejecting wastefulness and shortsighted planning.
In a fiery reaction to a recent statement made by Akhilesh Yadav during a press conference in Etawah, senior speaker Brijesh Kumar Mishra didn’t hold back. The controversy centers around Akhilesh Yadav’s appeal to the PDA (Pichda, Dalit, and Alpsankhyak) community, urging them not to offer donations or “daan-dakshina” to what he termed “dominant castes.” This seemingly indirect reference to the Brahmin community sparked strong emotional backlash, especially from those who consider religious rituals and priestly offerings a matter of cultural respect and spiritual duty—not dominance. Brijesh Mishra questioned Akhilesh Yadav’s authority to even make such statements. “Who gave him the right to talk about giving or not giving donations to Brahmins? That’s not a favor—it’s their rightful due,” he asserted. आज लखनऊ में ‘इटावा कथावाचन पीडीए अपमान कांड’ के पीड़ितों का सम्मान किया गया और उनकी आर्थिक हानि के लिए सहायता राशि दी गयी व जिस दृष्टिहीन कलाकार की ढोलक छीनी गयी, उसे नई ढोल भी दी गयी। – भागवत कथा तो सबके लिए है, जब सब सुन सकते हैं तो सब बोल क्यों नहीं सकते? – भागवत तो भगवान… pic.twitter.com/2py84caLTa — Akhilesh Yadav (@yadavakhilesh) June 24, 2025 💥 3 Key Points That Sparked the Debate 🧠 “If You Respect Your Ancestors, Respect the Priests Too” – A Cultural Perspective Brijesh Mishra’s argument wasn’t just a political counterblast—it was a cultural and emotional appeal. He reminded Yadav and others of the deep roots that connect Indian families with their traditions. “If you truly take pride in your heritage, you won’t insult the priests who help preserve it,” he declared. He also cautioned against inciting disrespect toward any particular community for short-term political gain. According to Mishra, statements like Akhilesh Yadav’s only deepen societal divisions and insult centuries-old cultural practices. जिन्हें ब्राह्मणों ने पीटा, उन्हीं कथावाचकों से Akhilesh Yadav ने करवाई कथा!#EtawahNews #AkhileshYadav #BhagwatKatha #CasteViolence #UPPolitics #PDA #DalitRights #SocialJustice #UPBreaking pic.twitter.com/r05i1h2ULW — NewsNasha (@newsnasha) June 24, 2025 😡 5 Times Politicians Hurt Sentiments for Votes – Is This #6? The video has stirred widespread emotion across social media, especially among the Brahmin community. Many feel this is just another example of political figures undermining traditions for vote bank politics. Brijesh Mishra’s response struck a chord with those who feel Brahmins are increasingly being marginalized in political narratives. 📌 Final Thoughts This incident is not just about one statement—it’s about the broader debate between tradition, caste identity, and politics in India. Brijesh Mishra’s sharp words reflect a growing frustration among certain sections of society who feel targeted or misrepresented for the sake of political optics. As India continues to evolve, so must its political discourse. But the question remains: Where do we draw the line between political opinion and cultural disrespect? 🔎 FAQs Q1. What did Akhilesh Yadav say about Brahmins?Akhilesh Yadav advised PDA society to avoid giving “daan-dakshina” to dominant castes, which many interpreted as a reference to Brahmins. Q2. Who responded to Akhilesh’s statement?Brijesh Kumar Mishra responded strongly, calling out Akhilesh’s comments as disrespectful and hypocritical. Q3. Why did Mishra question Mulayam Singh’s last rites?Mishra asked whether the former CM’s last rites were performed by a backward caste priest or a Brahmin, to point out the hypocrisy. Q4. What is daan-dakshina in Hindu rituals?It is a traditional offering made to Brahmins for performing religious rituals—considered a duty, not a favor. Q5. Is this incident affecting Akhilesh Yadav’s public image?Yes, it has sparked backlash among cultural and religious communities, potentially damaging his credibility in some circles.
In a shocking incident from Uttar Pradesh, BJP MLA Prakash Dwivedi, allegedly involved in illegal sand mining, assaulted an SDM and a police officer for intercepting his trucks carrying illegally mined sand (maurang). The incident has drawn sharp criticism from all quarters, reigniting debates around political arrogance, law enforcement helplessness, and the growing nexus between crime and politics. यूपी में एक BJP विधायक हैं- प्रकाश द्विवेदी, इन्हें बालू माफिया कहा जाता है। 'बालू माफिया' BJP विधायक प्रकाश द्विवेदी के दो ट्रक अवैध रूप से मौरंग लादकर जा रहे थे। रास्ते में SDM अमित शुक्ला ने विधायक जी के ट्रक रोक लिए और थाने ले जाने लगे। इसकी जानकारी 'बालू माफिया' BJP विधायक… pic.twitter.com/IbsiZtz1rx — Congress (@INCIndia) June 23, 2025 The chain of events unfolded when SDM Amit Shukla, during a routine check, stopped two trucks carrying illegally mined sand. Upon discovering they belonged to BJP MLA Prakash Dwivedi — infamously known as a ‘sand mafia’ — Shukla ordered the trucks to be taken to the police station for further investigation. When MLA Dwivedi got wind of the situation, he immediately called the SDM and issued direct threats, commanding him to release the trucks at once. Upon refusal, the MLA reportedly said, “Stay right there, I’ll show you your place,” and rushed to the location with his convoy. उत्तर प्रदेश- भाजपा विधायक प्रकाश द्विवेदी का SDM मामले पर बयान – pic.twitter.com/QuOB006s7G — Gaurav Singh Sengar (@sengarlive) June 24, 2025 What followed was an open display of lawlessness. Upon arriving, Dwivedi stepped out of his car and slapped the SDM twice. When a nearby police constable tried to intervene, he too was assaulted by the MLA. Eyewitnesses claimed that the MLA hurled vulgar abuses and issued death threats, vowing to kill anyone who tried to stop his illegal activities in the future. This ordeal lasted for about an hour, after which the officers, instead of taking legal action, apologized to the MLA, allegedly out of fear or pressure. This incident brings back memories of a similar one in 2008 when an SO (Station Officer) was slapped by a legislator for refusing to support illegal actions. At that time, the SO remained silent, but when the government changed and the legislator lost his seat, he was beaten by the police, even suffering a broken arm. Such incidents reflect the deep-rooted problems within our political and administrative systems — where power often overshadows justice, and law enforcers are rendered helpless. Social media exploded with reactions. Some users condemned the BJP for allowing mafias to flourish under their rule, labeling it as “Gundaraj”. Others pointed out that the Congress has no moral right to criticize, as the current political decay stems largely from its own history of corruption, nepotism, and vote bank politics. Several citizens expressed disappointment, saying that such lawlessness discourages honest officers, while a few sarcastically suggested that SDMs should resign and watch YouTube at home if they can’t exercise their power. What’s particularly alarming is that this entire issue revolves around illegal extortion and trade, in which, as some reports suggest, district officials themselves may be complicit. While the assault received media attention, no concrete evidence or action has surfaced, leading to further speculation about cover-ups and systemic rot. This raises serious concerns about the future of governance if such trends continue unchecked. In the end, the incident reflects not just the failure of a political party, but of a system that allows criminals to rule, while honest officers are punished or silenced. Whether it’s BJP or Congress, the root problem remains the same — unchecked power, political protection, and a lack of accountability. Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath has previously taken strict action against such elements, and the public now waits to see whether this case will see true justice or become just another forgotten scandal. FAQs 1. Who is Prakash Dwivedi?Prakash Dwivedi is a BJP MLA from Uttar Pradesh, allegedly involved in illegal sand mining activities and referred to as a “sand mafia” by critics. 2. What happened between the SDM and the MLA?The SDM, Amit Shukla, stopped two illegal sand trucks. Upon learning this, the MLA assaulted him and a police officer in broad daylight. 3. Was any action taken against the MLA?As of now, no firm legal action has been reported. Instead, officers were seen apologizing to the MLA after the altercation. 4. Why is this incident significant?It highlights the rising lawlessness, political interference in policing, and helplessness of honest officers in the face of political muscle. 5. How is the public reacting to the incident?The incident has triggered widespread outrage on social media, with citizens demanding justice and stronger governance.
Veteran actor Paresh Rawal’s departure from the much-loved Hera Pheri franchise has left a wave of disappointment among fans and fellow actors alike. Known for his unforgettable portrayal of Babu Bhaiya, Rawal played a crucial role in making the Hera Pheri series iconic in Indian cinema. The news of his exit from Hera Pheri 3, which stars Akshay Kumar and Suniel Shetty, caught everyone by surprise—including his co-stars. However, Rawal clarified that his decision was not based on any creative disagreements. “I reiterate that there are no creative differences with the filmmaker. I hold immense love, respect, and faith in M Priyadarshan, the film’s director,” he stated, putting to rest any speculation of conflict. While the franchise moves ahead without him, fans are left wondering how the beloved character of Babu Bhaiya can be replaced or reimagined. Sonakshi Sinha says she's with the internet, can't imagine 'Hera Pheri 3' without Paresh Rawal, as she opens up on working with her 'Nikita Roy' co-star #SonakshiSinha #PareshRawal #HeraPheri3 #HeraPheri #AkshayKumar #SunielShetty https://t.co/7A5mxMYEa3 — ETimes (@etimes) June 24, 2025 Interestingly, while the void left in Hera Pheri 3 stirs emotions, Paresh Rawal is all set to appear next in the film Nikita Roy, releasing in theatres on June 27. The film stars Sonakshi Sinha and is directed by her brother, Kussh S Sinha. Sonakshi, who is currently promoting the film, shared her thoughts on Rawal’s exit and her experience working with him. In a candid conversation with IANS, she said, “There is absolutely no way I can imagine the Hera Pheri franchise without Paresh Rawal.” Echoing the sentiment of millions of fans, Sonakshi emphasized how Rawal’s presence brought a unique charm and humor to the franchise that will be difficult to recreate. Her statement reflects the emotional connection audiences have with long-standing characters and actors, especially those who define a genre or generation of cinema. ‘Hera Pheri 3’: Sonakshi Sinha Calls Paresh Rawal the Soul of the Iconic Comedy Franchise, Says She Cannot Imagine Upcoming Instalment Without Himhttps://t.co/loPxEhKTWc@SonakshiSinha @SirPareshRawal #HeraPheri3 #HeraPheri #SonakshiSinha #PareshRawal #AkshayKumar — LatestLY (@latestly) June 24, 2025 Sonakshi also opened up about her experience working with Paresh Rawal in Nikita Roy. Describing it as “fantastic,” she added, “It was such an honor for me to share screen space with an actor of his calibre. In terms of his body of work and how amazing he is, it was an amazing experience for me.” Director Kussh S Sinha also expressed his gratitude for having Rawal on board. Speaking to ETimes, he shared that they had only two meetings before Rawal agreed to the project. “He’s spoiled for choice,” Kussh said, acknowledging the actor’s stature in the film industry. “Any director would want to work with Paresh ji. Ninety-nine percent of the industry would want to collaborate with him.” With Nikita Roy ready to hit the big screen, fans may find solace in seeing Rawal in a powerful new role, even as they come to terms with his absence from Hera Pheri 3. सोनाक्षी सिन्हा और ज़हीर इकबाल इन दिनों अपने रिलेशन और फैशन स्टाइल को लेकर सुर्खियों में हैं. हाल ही में दोनों को ऑल-व्हाइट आउटफिट्स में एक साथ देखा गया, और उनका यह लुक सोशल मीडिया पर ट्रेंड कर गया#SonakshiSinha #ZaheerIqbal #SonakshiZaheerWedding #CoupleGoals #Bollywood pic.twitter.com/c3uEntW9nt — State Mirror हिंदी (@StateMirrorHn) June 24, 2025 FAQs Q1: Why did Paresh Rawal leave Hera Pheri 3?A: Paresh Rawal clarified that his decision to leave Hera Pheri 3 was not due to any creative differences. He continues to respect the director, Priyadarshan, and made the choice on personal grounds. Q2: What role will Paresh Rawal play next?A: Paresh Rawal will appear next in Nikita Roy, a film starring Sonakshi Sinha and directed by her brother Kussh S Sinha. The film is set to release on June 27. Q3: What did Sonakshi Sinha say about Paresh Rawal’s exit from Hera Pheri?A: Sonakshi said she cannot imagine the franchise without Paresh Rawal and emphasized how essential his presence was to the film’s charm and appeal. Q4: How was Sonakshi’s experience working with Paresh Rawal?A: Sonakshi described the experience as fantastic and said it was an honor to work with someone of his calibre and immense talent. Q5: What is the release date of Nikita Roy?A: Nikita Roy is scheduled to release in theatres on June 27, featuring Paresh Rawal and Sonakshi Sinha in lead roles.
This season focuses heavily on local elections in Phulera, capturing the rivalry between Manju Devi and Kranti Devi. While earlier seasons emphasized comedy and simple village affairs, this one dives deeper into grassroots politics, power struggles, and emotional intricacies. Manju Devi, portrayed by Neena Gupta, is pitted against Kranti Devi, and their clash creates the core conflict of the story.
In a deeply emotional video making rounds on social media, a newly married woman named Mehak is seen breaking down in tears. Her husband gently asks her why she is crying, to which she reveals the emotional trauma she’s facing from harsh comments and criticism. “People tell me I’ve made a big mistake by leaving Islam. They say I’ll go to hell, question why my parents even gave birth to me.” Despite the emotional pain, Mehak firmly states, “I’ve done nothing wrong. I came to Sanatan Dharma on my own will.” Her words reflect the inner strength and conviction required to walk a path of faith that defies societal expectations. महक ने हिन्दू लड़के से शादी की….महक का कहना है की कुछ लोग कह रहे हैं की तुम जहन्नुम में जाओगी महक रो रही है लेकिन ये भी कह रही है की मैंने कुछ गलत नही किया और मुझे जहन्नुम का कोई डर नही pic.twitter.com/ErhOmYiG6L — 𝗔𝘀𝗵𝘂𝘁𝗼𝘀𝗵 𝗕𝗿𝗶𝗷𝘄𝗮𝘀𝗶 (@VedicAshutosh) June 23, 2025 No Regret, Only Resolve Mehak’s decision to embrace Sanatan Dharma is not an act of rebellion—it’s an act of self-realization. She confirms there was no pressure from her husband or anyone else. She chose her path after understanding and accepting it wholeheartedly. Her husband, standing by her side, reassures her, saying, “Let people speak. If you have come with your will, don’t let their words shake your faith.” In a time when many fear backlash for such personal choices, Mehak’s clarity is remarkable. This isn’t about changing names or rituals; it’s about spiritual alignment and the right to believe freely. Support and Reactions: A Mixed Bag While Mehak has faced her share of harsh comments and judgment, the support she’s received is also powerful. One user wrote, “Sister, you’ve come out of hell. Just keep your faith in God, everything will be fine.” Another said, “This isn’t a moment to cry—it’s a moment to be proud. You’ve entered a faith with no restrictions.” Others questioned the place of women in Islam and praised Mehak for stepping into a religion that, in their view, respects individual choice. These responses show that while the road is tough, she’s not alone. There is a growing awareness of the importance of free will in matters of faith and love. A Personal Decision, A Public Message Changing religion and marrying someone from another faith are monumental decisions, not taken lightly. Mehak’s journey symbolizes the importance of understanding, maturity, and personal experience. Many believe she saw flaws in her former faith and found peace in Sanatan Dharma. Her story is not just about religion; it’s about agency—the right of every adult to choose love, belief, and their path in life. For anyone criticizing her, the real question is not what religion she left, but whether we as a society respect someone’s right to choose their own spiritual home. ❓ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 1. Who is Mehak and why is her video trending?Mehak is a newly married woman who left Islam to embrace Sanatan Dharma, and her emotional video has sparked widespread discussion online. 2. Did Mehak convert under pressure?No, Mehak clearly states she converted of her own free will, without any external pressure. 3. What are people saying in support of Mehak?Supporters have praised her courage, saying she has moved toward a faith that respects freedom and equality, especially for women. 4. Is it legal to change religion in India?Yes, Indian law allows any adult to convert to another religion by choice, provided it’s done voluntarily. 5. What message does Mehak’s story send?Her story emphasizes the importance of religious freedom, personal choice, and standing strong despite criticism and threats.
नाम :- संत सिंह यादव जुर्म :- ब्राह्मणों के गांव में कथा कहने गए सजा :- ब्राह्मणों ने इनके बाल काटे,इनपर मूत्र का छिड़काव किया और बोला अब ब्राह्मण के मूत्र तुम पर पड़ गए अब तुम पवित्र हो गए. देश में आज भी ऐसी कुंठित सोच जीवित है। तब सोचिए हजारों साल पहले क्या होता होगा..? pic.twitter.com/h0wjTtSFhP — Pratik Patel (@PratikVoiceObc) June 23, 2025 What many regard as Hinduism or Sanatan Dharma is, in essence, structured as a Brahmin-centered religion, granting privilege almost exclusively to the Brahmin community. While it claims to represent all castes, real-world incidents often paint a darker picture of exclusion and violence. A shocking example comes from Bakewar in Etawah district, where a Yadav man narrating a Bhagwat Katha—a sacred Hindu storytelling tradition—was beaten, humiliated, and even had urine thrown on him. Why? Simply because he was not a Brahmin. This reflects a deep-rooted bias in religious practices that continues to sideline SC, ST, and OBC communities, even as they seek spiritual expression through traditions that should belong to all. जिसे आप सभी लोग हिंदू या सनातन धर्म समझते हैं असल में यह ब्राह्मण धर्म है इस धर्म में सारे विशेषाधिकार ब्राह्मण को है अगर यह हिंदू या सनातन धर्म सभी एससी –एसटी ओबीसी समाज के लोगों का होता, तो जिला इटावा के बकेवर जैसी घटनाएं कभी नहीं होती जिला इटावा बकेवर में एक व्यक्ति से… pic.twitter.com/6AHZwTc2b7 — Bhanu Nand (@BhanuNand) June 23, 2025 The Etawah Incident: Caste-Based Terror in Broad Daylight In the viral video that shook social media, a Yadav storyteller is seen being brutally attacked by members of the Brahmin community. His braid was cut, he was made to rub his head on the feet of his oppressors, and all of this happened because of his caste. The attackers couldn’t accept a non-Brahmin conducting a Bhagwat Katha. This disturbing act of caste terrorism was not only inhumane but also symbolic of a centuries-old oppression that many believe ended, but clearly persists. When such violent discrimination is carried out so openly, it raises serious questions about religious freedom, equal rights, and how little progress has been made despite constitutional protections. Time for a Spiritual Reawakening Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, understanding the systemic discrimination inherent in Hinduism, had adopted Buddhism with lakhs of his followers. This historical shift holds greater relevance today. If a religion cannot guarantee respect and dignity to all its followers, then perhaps it’s time to reconsider association with it. The Yadav community, and others who continue to face discrimination despite their spiritual contributions, must wake up with clarity and unity. Reciting Bhagwat Katha is not the birthright of any single caste. When religion becomes a tool of exclusion and violence, spiritual migration may be the only path to justice and equality. BIGGEST NEWS 🚨 ब्राह्मण परिवार ने भगवत कथा कराने के लिए धर्म शास्त्र ज्ञानी मुकुट मनी यादव और संत सिंह यादव को बुलाया. गांव के ही मंदिर के ब्राह्मण पुजारी पाठक बाबा और पप्पू महाराज ने भीड़ जुटा कर संत यादव और मुकुट मनी यादव को कहा चमार यादव होकर ब्राह्मण परिवार में कथा करने आए… pic.twitter.com/FN61G5LaVv — Kranti Kumar (@KraantiKumar) June 23, 2025 Ending Monopoly Over Faith The question must be asked: why can people from SC, ST, and OBC backgrounds listen to stories from Brahmins but not vice versa? Why is it acceptable for Brahmins to lead religious discourse, but unacceptable when others do the same? This double standard reveals the caste hierarchy embedded in religious rituals. No scripture explicitly states that only Brahmins can narrate the Bhagwat. Such exclusivity is man-made and oppressive. The Brahmin community must recognize that times have changed—awareness is rising, and people from all communities are claiming their rightful space in spiritual and social life. The atrocities committed in Bakewar are not just attacks on one individual—they’re assaults on equality, humanity, and India’s democratic ideals. इन तस्वीरों को सेव कर लीजिए. जब भी भाजपा के नेता आपके दरवाजे पर वोट मांगने आयें, उन्हें दिखाइएगा. इन अमानवीय व्यवहारों के लिए हर वो व्यक्ति जिम्मेदार है जिसने भाजपा को वोट दिया. जो गलती हो गई, दोबारा मत कीजिएगा. ठीक है न बिहार वालों?#BiharElections #BiharElections2025 pic.twitter.com/o3Jo20Oee8 — Neha Singh Rathore (@nehafolksinger) June 23, 2025 ❓ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 1. What happened in Bakewar, Etawah district?A Yadav man was attacked by Brahmins while narrating Bhagwat Katha, due to caste discrimination. 2. Why is this incident being called caste-based terrorism?Because the act involved violence, humiliation, and oppression purely on the basis of caste. 3. Are non-Brahmins allowed to perform Bhagwat Katha?There is no scriptural restriction, but social practices often discourage or prevent it. 4. What did Dr. Ambedkar do in response to caste discrimination in Hinduism?He converted to Buddhism along with millions, promoting equality and human dignity. 5. What steps can marginalized communities take?They can raise awareness, seek legal justice, and if needed, explore alternative spiritual paths like Buddhism.
If you’re someone who enjoys sipping tea during your train journeys, this news might leave a bitter aftertaste. A video circulating on Twitter has sparked outrage, showing a tea seller cleaning his kettle using water from a tap inside the train’s toilet. Not only is he using the same water to wash Maggi noodles, but the same kettle is reportedly used to serve tea to passengers throughout the train. The unsanitary act reflects a broader concern—passengers rarely know how the food or beverages served to them are prepared or whether hygiene protocols are followed at all. अगर आप चाय पीने की शौकीन हैं और आप ट्रेन में सफर करते हुए चाय पी लेते हैं तो यह वीडियो आपके लिए ही है pic.twitter.com/lUcOs9t1L9 — Bhanu Nand (@BhanuNand) June 23, 2025 Railways in Decline: More Than Just Delays The individual in the video doesn’t appear to be an official pantry worker, but a local vendor—raising questions about unchecked access and regulation on trains. Unfortunately, this is just one of many issues plaguing Indian Railways. Trains frequently run late, cleanliness is subpar, and overcrowding is common—even reserved passengers often find others occupying their seats. This latest incident has only intensified criticism, revealing a serious lapse in food safety and operational control on board. Public Reaction: “Not Fit for Consumption Tea” The video has gone viral, triggering strong reactions. One user tweeted, “From my 10 years of experience, nothing sold on trains is fit for consumption.” Journalist Ram Kashyap also commented, stating that though hotel kitchens are off-limits to customers, a certain level of hygiene is at least ensured—unlike what’s seen in trains. Such public feedback underlines the urgent need for Indian Railways to review and tighten food vendor regulations to protect passengers’ health. ❓ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 1. Is it safe to consume tea and snacks sold on Indian trains?No, unless they are from verified pantry services. Local vendors often lack hygiene standards. 2. Who regulates food vendors on Indian Railways?IRCTC is responsible, but enforcement appears weak, especially with unauthorized vendors. 3. What should I do if I witness unhygienic practices on trains?You can file a complaint via the Rail Madad app or tweet to @RailMinIndia with video/photo evidence. 4. Are pantry workers allowed to use train toilets for food preparation?Absolutely not. Such practices violate hygiene regulations and can be penalized. 5. How can passengers ensure food safety while traveling?Carry homemade food, use IRCTC e-catering, or buy only sealed and branded items.
Introduction In a powerful and emotional speech, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reminded the world of the hardships and the unwavering spirit of the Jewish people. Drawing from history, faith, and resilience, Netanyahu addressed the journey of Israel from persecution to statehood, from survival to success. His words paint not just a picture of struggle, but of strength—of a nation that refuses to be erased. From Persecution to Promise “75 years ago, we were brought here to die. We had no country, no army. Seven nations declared war on us. We were only 65,000. No one came to save us.” President Trump and I often say: ‘Peace through strength.’ First comes strength, then comes peace. And tonight, @realDonaldTrump and the United States acted with a lot of strength. pic.twitter.com/7lTWCZkgw7 — Benjamin Netanyahu – בנימין נתניהו (@netanyahu) June 22, 2025 These words echo the painful reality of Israel’s birth and the relentless challenges the Jewish people faced. Attacked repeatedly by neighboring nations—Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Jordan, Egypt, Libya, Saudi Arabia—Israel’s survival itself was a miracle. Yet, they held on. They were given a land that was 65% desert, and from that harsh soil, they built a thriving nation. The Spirit of Survival Netanyahu emphasized the historical resilience of the Jewish people: But through every attack, every siege, they held on—not just to land, but to Jerusalem—their eternal capital. A Nation Rebuilt from Ashes Israel’s rise is not just a geopolitical tale but a human story. From devastation, they cultivated: Netanyahu’s message is clear: “We are not your enemies. We do not conspire. We only wish to live with dignity in our land, in our home.” #BREAKING: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu organises special prayers for US President Donald Trump at the Western Wall in Jerusalem after US stormed nuclear sites in Iran with airstrikes. pic.twitter.com/XE7ODJnODr — Aditya Raj Kaul (@AdityaRajKaul) June 22, 2025 Historical Revisionism and Contested Narratives The speech also touched upon a deeper, more controversial layer: the appropriation of Jewish traditions and figures, according to Netanyahu. He referenced how: He framed this as a cultural and spiritual takeover, culminating in rejection and persecution when Jews refused to convert or accept the authority of later prophets. He further argued that cities like Yathrib became Medina, erasing Jewish identity from their own ancestral lands. Criticism and Counterpoint Not everyone agrees with Netanyahu’s narrative. Critics argue that: Critics accuse this narrative of being used to justify ongoing occupation and disregard for international calls for a two-state solution. Conclusion: The Eternal Flame of Jerusalem Despite criticism, Netanyahu’s speech reflects the unbreakable identity of a people rooted in history, tested by fire, and determined to flourish. Whether one agrees or disagrees with his politics, the undeniable spirit of survival, rebuilding, and vision that Israel represents continues to shape world history. “We were always in Jerusalem for 3,000 years. Now, we are again in our homeland—Israel. It was ours, it is ours, and it will remain ours.” FAQs 1. What is the central message of Netanyahu’s speech?Netanyahu emphasizes the historical suffering and resilience of the Jewish people and Israel’s right to exist and defend itself. 2. What historical events does the speech reference?The Holocaust, attacks from Arab nations, sieges on Jerusalem, and the transformation of Jewish cultural identity across centuries. 3. Why is Jerusalem so significant in the speech?Jerusalem is portrayed as the eternal capital and spiritual heart of the Jewish people, symbolizing endurance and identity. 4. What are the controversies surrounding this narrative?Critics argue that the speech ignores Palestinian history and British colonial support and frames modern conflict in religious and historical absolutism. 5. How has Israel contributed to the modern world according to the speech?Through innovation in technology, medicine, agriculture, and military defense—highlighting peaceful contributions to humanity.
Welcome to News Nexus.com – Your Gateway to News & Tools! At News Nexus.com, we bring you the latest and trending Bollywood news, current affairs, and insightful blog posts. Alongside entertainment and news, we also offer free online tools like GST Calculator, Brokerage Calculator, EMI Calculator, and more to make your daily life easier. Whether you’re here to stay updated or simplify tasks, News Nexus.com is your trusted digital companion.